Grid blogging (some notes pt.1)

I came across this lovely headline yesterday:"El sueño de Internet es que cualquiera puede ser la CNN, pero eso, al final de cuentas, es mentira" ("the dream of internet is that anybody can be the CNN, at the end of the day though, this is a lie" - despite this, the voice of the article goes on to list the some of the successes of personal publishing on the web). The question here though is: who wants to be the CNN?

I sometimes visualise the blogger as a character out of a nineteenth century novel (most likely something by Maupassant or Turgenev), sitting by the fireplace chatting about what s/he has read in an (electronic) gazette. Often equated as a threat, a competitor of professional journalists, the blogger, in my opinion, is closer to the figure of the editor (although trends are also evolving in the direction of "real-life" reporting, but that's the subject for another post).

I write these considerations both as a blogger, and as someone who has paid his bills working as a journalist and as an editor. As someone who is keenly aware of the mutations that occur when an activity is transposed from one medium to another.

The idea for grid blogging came into being as a way of exploring potential new structures of communication and conversation implict in the rise of "We Media". Abe put it nicely: "sort of like taking a hyperdimensional slice of blog space and turning it into a distributed magazine". The special issue magazine, is a good analogy and a decent relative.

Grid blogging also subverts the "impulse-writing" of the blog post by setting a publication date. A way, if you like, of contrasting the unrelenting flow of information, by dedicating time to thought and elaboration. Which brings us back to the CNN quote. Mass media, especially in the format of TV news, ploughs on regardless of understanding or the creation of connections between events. Cluster media, on the other hand, could help draw connections, assist understanding. In short, grid blogging is a humble exploration of new ways of producing selecting delivering news. Tactics for contaminating commentary.This is simply one of the many attempts to understand the way our voice will sound, the language we will speak across the mediasphere of this infant century.

November 12, 2003 | 01:41 PM
Comments

I want to set up a democratic council or federation of internet publishers who will collaborate to publicize a unified voice against capitalism and for the autonomy and self-management of the working class, for control over our own lives.

This idea sounds pretty similar to grid blogging. We should all talk and combine our power.

Posted by: Eric Blair at November 12, 2003 08:58 PM

This website keeps getting better and better.

matt lucas

Posted by: Matt Lucas at November 13, 2003 03:42 AM

I don't really see this as being about creating a unified (political) mouthpiece, but about generating a distributed model through which diverse voices/idiosyncratic views can promote/push a common conversation...

Posted by: ashley benigno at November 13, 2003 05:54 PM

That's all fine and good, I just said that we have similar ideas.

What I want to do is take "distributed publishing" beyond simple conversation and contemplation of an agreed topic to conversation and contemplation of future collective activity, which will ultimately require a different kind of unity than what a group of writer can accomplish by offering their diverse opinions on the same subject.

To reach this synthesis I want to add a form of democracy behind the scenes of and above/beyond what you already have called "Grid Blogging".

Do you know what I'm saying? There needs to be more coordination of the process and the results than people simply talking about the same topic. If not, who says people haven't already been Grid Blogging hardcore every day since the beginning of the war in Iraq?

At any rate I'm curious to see what comes of this idea you have. I will definitely publish some of my writings about "brand" on Dec 1.

respect.
eric blair
politicalgraffiti.net

Posted by: Eric Blair at November 13, 2003 07:34 PM

Eric, I understand the things you're saying, and I certainly agree the time is right to explore new forms of networked activity, both online and off. I find it extremely positive that questions such as what democracy should mean in the twentyfirst century are being discussed by highly diverse groups across the globe, from the Lacondian jungle in Mexico, to Christian volunteer groups, via progressive venture capitalists such as Joi Ito in Japan.

Also good to know you'll be taking part on Dec. 1

Posted by: ashley benigno at November 14, 2003 04:28 PM